Preparing the Ground

Approach

Leadership and Vision Phase

The overall purpose of this phase is to raise awareness of sustainability issues and how they may affect the organisation’s quality and performance.

The first step for leaders in the FE system will be to clarify and revisit their strategic mission and vision in the context of sustainable development. As a first step the actions contained under the leadership and vision phase in the SIGMA table are a useful guide:

  • To secure board level and senior management understanding and commitment to integrate sustainability into core management processes and decision-making
  • To identify stakeholders and consult them on key impacts and approaches
  • To develop a business case for sustainability
  • To formulate a long-term sustainability vision and high-level strategy.

The World Wide Fund for Nature's document ‘Learning for Sustainability’, The Earth Charter, and The Land Based Colleges National Consortium Sustainable Development Learning Pack, all provide useful suggestions. All three will help your organisation define sustainable development and think about the approaches you should take.

Key questions that you should be asking yourself (ves) are:

All of these questions will be based on an assessment of where the organisation currently is in relation to its sustainable development objectives and the need to review progress and track trends.

Who needs to be involved?

Initially, this will be the senior management team along with governors or board members.

You may choose to establish a dedicated team or appoint key individuals (e.g. sustainable development champions).

Key activities

Formulate the (business) case for sustainability. One suggested resource is
Project SIGMA; also see the CEL’s September 2007 publication: Leadership for Sustainability, Making sustainable development a reality for leaders;
Raise awareness and begin the process of cultural change throughout your organisation through meetings and workshops.

When do these activities start?

Now is a good time!

Expected outcomes

  • an internal business case for sustainable development.
  • a revised vision and mission statement
  • a communication plan for the revised vision and mission
  • a stakeholder consultation report

Useful tips

If you choose to develop a separate vision and mission for sustainable development they will need to be clearly linked to the overall vision and mission and ultimately they will need to be integrated. You will need to think about what your organisation’s limits or boundaries are in relation to sustainable development and identify any trade-offs.
For example existing building fabric may mean that there will be limitations as to how sustainable a building can be.

The Sustainable Development Education Panel, produced a good step-by-step guide to establishing a Sustainability Management System, which you may find useful at this stage.

Back to top


Planning

Key questions that you should be asking yourself (ves) are:

  • Where are we now?
  • What is our current level of performance against the vision and mission and operating principles?
  • What are our legal requirements in relation to sustainable development?
  • Do we comply?
  • How do we integrate sustainable development into our management procedures?
  • What short-term actions do we need to take?

Who needs to be involved?

Initially it needs to be senior management, champions (if appropriate) and key internal and external stakeholders.

Key activities

When do the activities start?

Integrate into the timescales of the existing management and reporting cycle.

Expected outcomes

  • Baseline review report.
  • Implementation and management plan.
  • Stakeholder feedback report.
  • Compliance and improvement report.
  • Training and development plan.
  • Actions, impact and outcome report.
  • Identification of strategic priorities and actions.
  • Board level consultation and signoff.

At this stage it will be worthwhile revisiting policy statements for adaptation and reissue.

Commit to review strategies after initial implementation. Review the skills, knowledge and competencies of key managers.

Back to top

Action

Key questions that you should be asking yourself (ves) are:

  • What organisation change is necessary and desirable?
  • What management processes do we need to change?
  • How will we communicate the sustainability message and changes identified?
  • Are the links between words and action strong enough?

Who needs to be involved?

Senior and middle management, board members, sustainable development champions and/or implementation team.

Key activities

  • Agreeing and implementing a sustainable development action plan, with timescales and milestones.
  • Assigning roles and responsibilities for specific actions in line with skills and competence.
  • Implementing sustainable development awareness and training programmes as required.
  • Consulting and communicating on the agreed actions.
  • Reviewing and refining corporate governance and sustainable development reporting arrangements.
  • Identifying opportunities to influence external agencies e.g. community bodies, employers, trade organisations and suppliers in sustainability terms.
  • Fostering linkages at senior and middle management level between those responsible for different areas of action e.g. estates and curriculum. See this report from London Sustainability Exchange (LSX) for ideas.
  • Engaging with the community.
  • Reporting on SD activity at management meetings and to governors or board members.

A selection of useful guidance here includes:

SIGMA research & development report on Learning, Innovation and Culture Change. This report explores how organisations can initiate change in line with the principles of sustainable development.


A useful SIGMA review of 20 standards and guidelines relevant to the implementation of sustainable development. It includes the UN Global Compact, EMAS, The Natural Step, Social Accountability 8000, Investors in People, Global Sullivan Principles, The Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code, Balanced Scorecard, the European Foundation Quality Model Excellence Model, The Global Reporting Initiative, AA1000 framework, Combined Code of Corporate Governance, ISO family of standards, the London Benchmarking Group, OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, Caux Roundtable Principles for Business, Amnesty International’s Human Rights Guidelines for Companies, the Principles for Global Corporate Responsibility, Business Impact Task Force, UK Government Sustainable Development Strategy.

Communicating Sustainability. UNEP. (2005) This guide shows how communication can be used to promote more sustainable lifestyles. It is designed to be read by anyone who wants to develop and implement awareness campaigns on these issues.

When do they start?

From the outset and ongoing.

Expected outcomes

  • Record of sustainable development activities undertaken and their impact on performance
  • Sustainable development organisational chart showing roles, responsibilities, reporting and communication lines
  • Revised corporate governance sustainable development reporting procedures
  • New partnerships and collaborative activities with community and businesses on sustainable development issues
  • Organisational websites, prospectus and other communication devices make explicit reference to sustainability actions and impacts
  • Sustainable Development should inform all CPD programmes, and training should be incorporated into induction for new staff so the knowledge base is maintained

Recognise that cultural change takes time. Take time to explain change plans and identify benefits for those involved in the change. Learn from previous change processes what worked well and what was less successful?

Back to top


Monitoring

Key questions that you should be asking yourself (ves) are:

  • Are we doing what we say we do?
  • Does our performance reflect significant sustainability actions, impacts and outcomes identified from the baseline review?
  • Are our tactical and strategic approaches improving our performance?
  • Who are we reporting to and what are we reporting?
  • How credible and transparent is our reporting?
  • Should we include impartial assurance as part of the reporting process (e.g. OFSTED reports)?

Who needs to be involved?

Board members, senior management, sustainable development implementation team and/or champions. Possibly self-assessment and/or independent audit team.

Key activities

  • Collecting and evaluating objective evidence and stakeholder perception surveys or questionnaires with regards to sustainable development profile and 'performance'
  • Assessing new opportunities for sustainable development performance improvement
  • Selecting and training internal self-assessment team on relevant sustainable development issues
  • Producing and communicating sustainable development progress report
  • Regularly review and improve knowledge transfer and communication systems to ensure that key initiatives are widely replicated both within individual providers and between organisations

Further resources

OFSTED (2003) Taking the first steps forward – towards an education for sustainable development.

Good practice in school self-evaluation and college self-assessment. A practical guide for managers at all levels. It clarifies what self-evaluation and self-assessment are and why organisations are required to do them. This is followed by an identification of the critical success factors in self-evaluation and self-assessment. The annex contains a series of checklists and a summary of good practice.

EAUC BITC Benchmarking Report. This report is from a pilot project using this monitoring tool in universities.

When do these activities start?

Throughout the delivery phase and at agreed time frames, appropriate to the specific impact of the sustainability objective.

Expected outcomes

  • Progress report against sustainable development strategies, tactical plans, objectives and targets
  • Recommendations for improvement in terms of sustainable development
  • Integration of key elements of sustainable development progress into organisational self-assessment report

The review process should result in clearly communicated findings, which should form the basis for the next round of strategic and tactical planning.

Both inspection criteria and self-assessment practice in FE need to be aligned with appropriate sustainability criteria. To date the common inspection framework does not contain any specific reference to sustainable development. The performance review process described above could be integrated into the organisational self-assessment process.

The case for an integrated approach

Few organisations have yet to achieve a truly integrated approach to the issue of sustainability. Do not let this stop you from starting your journey. There will inevitably be confusion over the scope and timeframes for achieving a sustainable organisation. There will be competing and conflicting ideas and approaches. But this is part of the learning process. By adopting a systematic management framework as outlined in this section, and in conjunction with the other sections of this toolkit, it is more likely that you will achieve a more coherent and less fragmented approach to your actions and performance. Fragmented approaches tend to undermine the achievement of organisational sustainability.

There are two good case studies of an integrated approach:

Back to top